<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Challenges for Federated Searching</title>
	<atom:link href="http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/07/21/review-challenges-for-federated-searching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/07/21/review-challenges-for-federated-searching/</link>
	<description>Covers topics related to federated search and the deep web</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Arnold</title>
		<link>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/07/21/review-challenges-for-federated-searching/comment-page-1/#comment-2727</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/07/21/review-challenges-for-federated-searching/#comment-2727</guid>
		<description>Is an entity with multiple search systems and duplication of functions qualified to comment on federated search? Quasi government agencies often mire themselves in situations that conflict with generalizations about search and content processing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is an entity with multiple search systems and duplication of functions qualified to comment on federated search? Quasi government agencies often mire themselves in situations that conflict with generalizations about search and content processing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
