<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Federated search in the enterprise</title>
	<link>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/04/17/federated-search-in-the-enterprise/</link>
	<description>Covers topics in the federated search field.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 19:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wire &#187; Federated Search for Google Search Appliance</title>
		<link>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/04/17/federated-search-in-the-enterprise/#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>wire &#187; Federated Search for Google Search Appliance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/04/17/federated-search-in-the-enterprise/#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>[...] Google&#8217;s PageRank probably won&#8217;t fare well in the enterprise. He says it this way in a previous post: &#8230;the popular search engines perform full text searches of unstructured text but enterprise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google&#8217;s PageRank probably won&#8217;t fare well in the enterprise. He says it this way in a previous post: &#8230;the popular search engines perform full text searches of unstructured text but enterprise [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
