Comments on: Content access basics - Part IV - SRU/SRW/Z39.50 http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/01/16/content-access-basics-part-iv-srusrwz3950/ Covers topics in the federated search field. Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:20:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Barrie Cooper http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/01/16/content-access-basics-part-iv-srusrwz3950/#comment-1599 Barrie Cooper Tue, 13 May 2008 11:26:51 +0000 http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/01/16/content-access-basics-part-iv-srusrwz3950/#comment-1599 ...and which interface should a content provider implement who is new to this field? I have a website written in ASP.NET which needs to support Federated Search. SRU/SRW looks like the most sensible to me at the moment. …and which interface should a content provider implement who is new to this field?

I have a website written in ASP.NET which needs to support Federated Search. SRU/SRW looks like the most sensible to me at the moment.

]]> By: Stephen Francoeur http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/01/16/content-access-basics-part-iv-srusrwz3950/#comment-1049 Stephen Francoeur Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:39:42 +0000 http://federatedsearchblog.com/2008/01/16/content-access-basics-part-iv-srusrwz3950/#comment-1049 So what standard works best for the federated search tools? How can one define best? Which standard is likely to provide the easiest results for the fed. search vendor to parse? So what standard works best for the federated search tools? How can one define best? Which standard is likely to provide the easiest results for the fed. search vendor to parse?

]]>