<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dogpile comes out at the top of the pile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://federatedsearchblog.com/2007/12/09/dogpile-comes-out-at-the-top-of-the-pile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2007/12/09/dogpile-comes-out-at-the-top-of-the-pile/</link>
	<description>Covers topics related to federated search and the deep web</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2007/12/09/dogpile-comes-out-at-the-top-of-the-pile/comment-page-1/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federatedsearchblog.com/2007/12/09/dogpile-comes-out-at-the-top-of-the-pile/#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>I've just discovered this blog - it's very well designed; and this post about customer satisfaction with Dogpile which I had missed. I can say that "information professionals" look askance at metasearchers like Dogpile and sibling Metacrawler (and others) because of sponsored results and difficulty in using syntax (not to mention distrust). But the "untrained" searcher may prefer these metasearchers because they return fewer results and relevance is higher since the selection is from the top results of the top 4 engines.  I know a couple of people  who use Metacrawler rather than Google for those reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just discovered this blog - it&#8217;s very well designed; and this post about customer satisfaction with Dogpile which I had missed. I can say that &#8220;information professionals&#8221; look askance at metasearchers like Dogpile and sibling Metacrawler (and others) because of sponsored results and difficulty in using syntax (not to mention distrust). But the &#8220;untrained&#8221; searcher may prefer these metasearchers because they return fewer results and relevance is higher since the selection is from the top results of the top 4 engines.  I know a couple of people  who use Metacrawler rather than Google for those reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
