<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dogpile comes out at the top of the pile</title>
	<atom:link href="http://federatedsearchblog.com/2007/12/09/dogpile-comes-out-at-the-top-of-the-pile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2007/12/09/dogpile-comes-out-at-the-top-of-the-pile/</link>
	<description>Covers topics related to federated search and the deep web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 05:01:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://federatedsearchblog.com/2007/12/09/dogpile-comes-out-at-the-top-of-the-pile/comment-page-1/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://federatedsearchblog.com/2007/12/09/dogpile-comes-out-at-the-top-of-the-pile/#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just discovered this blog - it&#039;s very well designed; and this post about customer satisfaction with Dogpile which I had missed. I can say that &quot;information professionals&quot; look askance at metasearchers like Dogpile and sibling Metacrawler (and others) because of sponsored results and difficulty in using syntax (not to mention distrust). But the &quot;untrained&quot; searcher may prefer these metasearchers because they return fewer results and relevance is higher since the selection is from the top results of the top 4 engines.  I know a couple of people  who use Metacrawler rather than Google for those reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just discovered this blog &#8211; it&#8217;s very well designed; and this post about customer satisfaction with Dogpile which I had missed. I can say that &#8220;information professionals&#8221; look askance at metasearchers like Dogpile and sibling Metacrawler (and others) because of sponsored results and difficulty in using syntax (not to mention distrust). But the &#8220;untrained&#8221; searcher may prefer these metasearchers because they return fewer results and relevance is higher since the selection is from the top results of the top 4 engines.  I know a couple of people  who use Metacrawler rather than Google for those reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

